Menu
Housing & Communities Planning for the Future Death & Estates Health Older Adults Consumer Protection Non-Profit Organizations & Charities Debts & Credit Government & Government Agencies Courts & Legal Systems Crimes & Fines Victims Resources for Teachers Legal Information for Newcomers Family Law Saskatchewan Workplace Sexual Harassment (SHIFT) About PLEA Contact Us Search

Proper Use of Authority

Government agencies have the authority to make decisions in certain circumstances. Agencies cannot deal with matters unless the law authorizes them to. Even then, there are rules that govern how agencies must make decisions.

Authority of Government Agencies

The government gives agencies authority to make decisions. This authority comes through laws that establish the agency and the rules it operates by. Government agencies cannot make decisions on matters unless they have this authority.

Type of Decision

The type of decision must be one that the agency has the authority to make. A government agency can only make decisions on things if the law says it can. For example, an agency established to handle work-related injury claims could not decide if a worker can receive social assistance.

Manner of Decision

The way that an agency makes a decision must also be authorized by law. These laws give agencies discretion to make decisions and rules to follow. If agencies do not use their discretion properly or follow the rules, their decision could be overturned.

There are several ways that an agency could improperly decide something…

  • They cannot give another agency the authority to make decisions that only it is authorized to make. Agencies can delegate some work, but they must ultimately have control over the decision.
  • They cannot have a policy that restricts their decision-making authority. For example, an agency may have the authority to compensate victims of crime for expenses such as counselling and physiotherapy. In this case, they cannot decide that they will never compensate for counselling expenses as a matter of policy.
  • They cannot use the powers that they have been given for a different purpose. For example, an agency may have the authority to expropriate land for conservation purposes. In this case, they could not expropriate land to be used for something like a restaurant.
  • They cannot take irrelevant matters into account when making their decisions. For example, an agency could not consider someone’s gender when deciding if the landlord could evict them from a rental property.

How helpful was this article?

PLEA offers free online training on preventing and addressing workplace harassment.

Workplace Harassment Prevention Training

CHECK IT OUT We're here to help.

Housing & Communities

Planning for the Future

Death & Estates

Health

Older Adults

Consumer Protection

Non-Profit Organizations & Charities

Debts & Credit

Courts & Legal System

Government & Government Agencies

Crimes & Fines

Victims

About PLEA

PLEA gratefully acknowledges our primary core funder the Law Foundation of Saskatchewan for their continuing and generous support of our organization.